Holding a Manufacturer Accountable for a Defective Airbag: Case Study Holding a Manufacturer Accountable for a Defective Airbag - HHJ Trial Attorneys
4.85
1000+ Reviews

Holding a Manufacturer Accountable for a Defective Airbag

car interior with broken windshield and bloodshed airbag after accident
Founding partner of HHJ Trial Attorneys Elliott Jung black and white portrait

Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College

Adam copy

University of California, Berkeley

Updated: March 10, 2026

HHJ Trial Attorney’s content follows strict guidelines for editorial accuracy and integrity. Learn more about our editorial guidelines .

car interior with broken windshield and bloodshed airbag after accident
In This Article

David, a 40-year-old architect, was driving his late-model sedan to a client meeting on a typical weekday morning. He was navigating through moderate city traffic, maintaining a safe speed and paying close attention to his surroundings. As he approached an intersection, the car in front of him stopped abruptly to avoid a pedestrian who had stepped off the curb unexpectedly.

David reacted quickly, slamming on his brakes. He couldn’t avoid the collision entirely, but he managed to slow his vehicle significantly before making contact. It was a relatively minor, low-speed, front-end collision. The damage to the vehicles was minimal—a cracked bumper and a dented grille. In a normal situation, David would have walked away with nothing more than a spike of adrenaline and a frustrating call to his insurance company.

However, this was not a normal situation. The safety systems in David’s car, designed to protect him, failed catastrophically.

Upon impact, the driver’s side steering wheel airbag deployed. But instead of inflating with a controlled burst of gas to cushion David’s forward momentum, the airbag inflator ruptured with the force of a small explosive device. The metal housing of the inflator shattered, sending jagged, high-velocity metal shrapnel tearing through the airbag fabric and directly into the cabin of the vehicle.

The shrapnel struck David in the face and neck with devastating force. He suffered severe, deep facial lacerations, chemical burns from the propellant gases, and, most tragically, a piece of metal pierced his left eye.

David was rushed to the emergency room, where trauma surgeons worked frantically to stabilize him and save his vision. Despite multiple complex surgeries, the damage to his eye was too severe. David suffered permanent, irreversible vision loss in his left eye. His face was permanently scarred, and he required extensive reconstructive surgery. His career as an architect, which relied heavily on his visual acuity and depth perception, was suddenly in jeopardy. A minor fender-bender had turned into a life-altering tragedy because of a defective product.

Taking on an Automotive Goliath

Product liability cases against major automotive manufacturers are among the most challenging and complex areas of personal injury law. These massive corporations have virtually unlimited resources, teams of aggressive defense attorneys, and a vested interest in protecting their brand reputation and avoiding massive recalls.

When David filed a claim against the manufacturer, their legal team immediately went on the offensive. Their strategy was classic corporate defense: deny, delay, and deflect.

First, they attempted to blame the severity of David’s injuries on the crash itself, arguing that the impact was more severe than David claimed and that the injuries were a natural consequence of the collision, not a defect in the airbag. When that argument failed against the clear evidence of the low-speed impact, they shifted tactics.

They argued that the airbag deployment was within “acceptable safety parameters” and that the shrapnel was an unforeseeable, freak occurrence. They deployed a team of corporate engineers and “independent” experts to produce highly technical, jargon-filled reports designed to confuse the issue and obscure the fundamental defect in the inflator’s design.

They also engaged in aggressive delay tactics, dragging out the discovery process, filing endless motions, and attempting to bury David in legal paperwork. They hoped to exhaust his financial resources and his emotional resolve, pressuring him into accepting a lowball settlement just to end the grueling litigation. David was facing a lifetime of disability, mounting medical bills, and a corporate giant determined to crush his claim.

Uncovering a Deadly Corporate Secret

When David brought his case to HHJ Trial Attorneys, we knew we were in for a massive fight. We are not intimidated by corporate giants or their armies of lawyers. We immediately assembled a specialized team dedicated to dismantling the manufacturer’s defense and proving their gross negligence.

Our first step was to secure the vehicle and preserve the crucial evidence. We obtained a court order preventing the manufacturer from inspecting or altering the vehicle without our experts present. We then retained some of the nation’s leading automotive engineering and biomechanical experts.

These experts meticulously examined the ruptured airbag inflator, the deployment mechanism, and the chemical composition of the propellant. They conducted extensive testing and analysis, ultimately producing undeniable, scientifically sound reports proving that the inflator’s design was inherently defective. They demonstrated that the propellant used was unstable and prone to explosive degradation over time, particularly in humid environments, leading directly to the catastrophic rupture.

But we didn’t stop at proving the defect in David’s specific vehicle. We launched a massive investigation into the manufacturer’s history. We combed through thousands of pages of internal corporate documents, safety testing reports, and consumer complaints. We uncovered a chilling pattern: the manufacturer had known about the potential for these inflators to rupture for years, yet they had failed to issue a timely recall or adequately warn consumers of the deadly risk.

We compiled this overwhelming evidence. the expert engineering reports, the biomechanical analysis of David’s injuries, and the damning internal documents proving corporate knowledge and cover-up—into a massive, airtight case for gross negligence and product liability. We made it clear to the manufacturer’s legal team that we were fully prepared to take this case to trial, expose their deadly secret to a jury, and seek massive punitive damages.

A $1.5 Million Settlement for David

Faced with our relentless preparation, the undeniable scientific proof of the defect, and the terrifying prospect of their internal documents being presented to a jury in a public trial, the manufacturer’s defense completely collapsed. They knew that a jury would be outraged by their prioritization of profits over human life and would likely award a massive, headline-making verdict.

To avoid the public relations disaster and the financial exposure of a trial, the manufacturer capitulated. After intense, high-stakes negotiations, we secured a life-changing $1.5 million settlement for David.

This massive recovery was a profound victory for David and a powerful message to the automotive industry. The settlement provided David with the immense financial resources he needed to adapt to his permanent vision loss. It fully covered his extensive past and future medical expenses, including specialized reconstructive surgeries and adaptive technologies. It compensated him for his lost earning capacity and the profound impact the injury had on his career and quality of life. Most importantly, it held a negligent corporation accountable for their deadly product, providing David with a sense of justice and the financial security to rebuild his life.

professional attorney and founding partner of HHJ Elliott Jung
Elliot H. Jung

Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College

Elliot H. Jung is a trial attorney at HHJ Trial Attorneys who focuses on helping injured clients navigate complex personal injury cases. With an emphasis on advocacy, case strategy, and client support, he works to secure fair outcomes for people facing medical bills, lost wages, and other accident-related losses. His approach combines legal experience with a commitment to clear communication and effective representation.

In This Article
Settlements & Verdicts

Related Blogs

Message us for a free consultation